The One Stop They Can’t Eliminate Could Protect Your Portfolio the Most

The most basic principle of making money is not losing it.

If there’s no way around that – then don’t lose more than you make.

Now this may sound easy to do… but it isn’t.

Sometimes trading can feel like a bet that’s gone horribly wrong.

You put your money on the table, and the market takes it, having no intention of ever giving it back.

But there’s one thing you should know that will set you apart from the trader who loses it all …

How to utilize a “stop.”

And I’m not talking about the one that the New York Stock Exchange is eliminating…

Forget the Stop and Good-Till-Canceled Orders…. Options are Your Stop Loss Protection

Next week, on February 26, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) will no longer accept stop orders and good-till-canceled (GTC) orders. A stop order is an order where the price is set above the underlying asset’s (the stock’s) current value (called a buy-stop order) or below its current value (called a sell stop order). A GTC order is order that stays open until it’s filled or canceled by the trader.

A stop order is designed to limit the loss on a trade while a GTC order allows you to wait and see if the trade is moving in your favor, allowing you to move on your position without a time restriction.

Now you can probably imagine why the NYSE’s decision to eliminate these orders is causing traders to worry…

But we’re going to talk about the one reason they shouldn’t worry at all – and it’s called options.

The beauty of options is that they offer a way profit off of stock moves without having to shell out lofty amounts of cash to buy the stock itself.

Let’s take a look at why…

Say you decide to buy 100 shares of a stock at $190 instead of buying one contract on a $190 call option that expires in one month. After buying the shares, the stock loses 80 points and drops down to $110 – giving you a loss in value of 47%. Now this may be an unrealized loss, but it’s a loss nonetheless.

To make matters worse… let’s say that the money you had to buy that stock was everything you had in your account. You’re not now only left down 47% on your trade… you’ve also just lost 47% of your entire account.

Now I want to stress that I am NOT an advocate of spending all you have on one trade. Even spending 50-60% of your account size on one trade is too much. But I’ve seen too many traders do this, which is why I want to talk about it.

In this case, you bet virtually all of the money in your account on one trade and lost half of it as a result.

But had you bought that call option, you would’ve only risk 9%. Even if you lost 100% of the premium, you would’ve risked only 9% of the full stock price down to zero.

And if you think that stocks don’t go all the way down to zero… then tell that to anyone who invested in Lehman Brothers, as just one example.

The bottom line is …

There’s Less Risk Trading Options than Going Long on Stock

Buying an option inherently creates a built-in stop protection for your portfolio because of the reduced risk potential that is in exists in the old buy-and-hold strategy.

Look at LinkedIn Corp (NYSE: LNKD), which has suffered a substantial drop…


Looking at this chart, I’m not too sure that investors are feeling great and saying “hey, at least it’s not trading at zero.”

Now you could buy 100 shares of the stock for a grand total of $19,000…

Or you could buy one March 190 call option (100 shares) and only spend $1,705.


Let’s delve a little deeper using LNKD as our case study…

Post its earnings report, LNKD dropped to $110 and is now at around $105 per share.

But let’s say you chose to go long the stock, adding a stop loss order to sell the stock at the current market price once it hits or goes through the stop.

In this case, the stock never reached the $170 stop price and actually dropped to around $110. This means that the trade would have been stopped out at, say, $110, resulting in a loss of $80 per share – or $8,000.

The stop limit order (an order to buy stock at or sell stock at or above a certain price) would hurt you a bit more because it only would have stopped you the stock hit that $170 price per share. If it gapped – as it did- then the stop limit at $170 would still be in place. This means that you would still own LNKD when it’s trading at just $105.

And your loss potential?

$89 points – or $8,900.

Compare that to the loss you’d face on that March $190 call option – $1,705. The stock devalued by 47%, and the option (even if 100% of the loss is realized) is only 9%.

The less experienced and ill-informed trader will spend money to buy the stock, using the stop order as “protection.” However, the percentage loss of that stop may be a greater percentage loss to the portfolio than buying an option – even if the option loses 100%.  This is because a 100% loss on the option may only result in a 2-3% loss of the overall portfolio.

And what’s more is that the unrealized loss on the stock could be upwards of 40-60% of the portfolio if you’re not careful and risk that much to begin with.

But the professional and savvy trader will look at the cost of the option, including even a 100% loss potential, as the overall risk to the portfolio. And the potential risk to the portfolio using an option strategy is much less than that of the buy-and-hold strategy.

Now you can reduce your risk even more buy creating a loophole trade, like the bull call spread below:


Rather than having the full $2,705 of the March 190 call at risk, you’d be risking $218, which is only a 1.1% risk of the $19,000 it would otherwise take to go long the 100 shares of LNKD.

Now what you’ll want to avoid doing, though, is spending as much money to buy a quantity of option contracts as you would on the stock itself.

But when you compare buying stock to buying options, you’ll see that the option IS your stop order protection.

STRATEGY: Using Options to Minimize Risk

On February 26, the New York Stock Exchange will no longer accept stop orders and good-till-canceled orders. But there’s an even better way to protect your portfolio, and it’s built in. Here’s why options can offer the best risk management:

  1. One options contract costs less than 100 shares of stock
  2. Options were originally created to hedge against and minimize risk
  3. Options traders risk less than buy-and-hold investors

Until next time…

Good Trading,

Tom Gentile

P.S. Don’t forget about a special Webinar I’m hosting this Thursday (February 18) where I’ll be talking to Wall Street legend, Marc Chaikin, about profiting on market chaos. You won’t want to miss this, so make sure you register here.

3 Responses to “The One Stop They Can’t Eliminate Could Protect Your Portfolio the Most”

  1. Vince, good questions. As for IPOs, the only 2 ways that I know how to get an IPO before it goes public is if you have a great relationship with your brokerage firm, they could offer you a small amount of shares at the PRE IPO offering. You would need to be one of their better customers in order to get that. The other way I know how to do this is with an IPO ETF such as PRIVX, which specializes in getting their hands on as many IPOs as possible, and their ETF trades based on how well the stocks do following the IPO. As for your other question about pink sheets, I have never traded those so I cant comment on them.

Leave a Comment

View this page online: