The Shocking Reason Economists’ “Recession Cries” May Be Right This Time

Just after the first Fed meeting back in January, Financial Times Magazine surveyed 51 economists about the likelihood of another recession. According to them, there’s a 15% chance of the next recession hitting within two years and a 20% chance of the next recession hitting within 12 months.

But these “predictions” aren’t new. And they’re not because of the election, either.

Even in March, Bloomberg interviewed Jim Rogers, George Soros’ former business partner. Rogers also called for a recession to hit within the next year – which only gives us until March 2017. Now one of the many reasons behind his “forecast” is that the U.S. sees a recession every four to seven years – and it’s been nearly a decade since the last one.

The thing is… predictions such as these happen like (broken) clockwork, every single year.

But this time, they may have actually nailed it.

And this is the shocking reason why…

Quarterly Earnings Could Drive the U.S. Economy into the Next Recession

There are many reasons Jim Rogers and 51 economists called for a 20% chance of a recession within the next 12 months, with low interest rates, the slowdown in China, and the fall of the pound taking the lead.

Now these are all accurate potential drivers. But possibly the biggest indication of what’s to come is this…

The U.S. is already in an earnings recession.

Earnings have been a sore spot for S&P 500 companies, in particular, which have now posted five consecutive quarters of negative growth. And we basically haven’t seen any real growth in corporate earnings for a couple of years now, too. In fact, it was only as of the end of the second quarter when the pundits revised their third-quarter earnings expectations from 0.2% to -2.4%.

On top of that, there are 114 S&P 500 companies that give “earnings guidance” every quarter. This is basically the company’s prediction of how it will fare during earnings. And of these companies, nearly 80% of them gave bad (or negative) earnings guidance. Within that percentage group, 100% of the companies have seen their stocks’ average share prices fall by 1.2%.

The biggest problem is that it’s not just one sector, either…

Unlike previous years, where “profit warnings” typically stemmed from one industry (like energy), it’s coming from many this time, like Ford, General Mills, and Kroger, to name a few.

This has financial analysts, economists, and Wall Street extremely worried. As just one example, investment strategists with one of the world’s largest brokerage firms, Russell Investments, reported in July that the extent of the bleak earnings scenario right now is “rare outside of an economic recession.”

And as I’m sure both you – and your portfolio – have seen, there’s really been no major movement in the market since this earnings recession began last year.

Even my proprietary tool, Money Calendar, shows January as taking on a historically bearish tone. And this is all what I’m seeing before the election. Imagine how that could change after…

There’s also a growing concern in the options trading world over the fear creeping into this market ahead of November 8th. And this concern, unfortunately, is backed by the volatility in options premiums, as you can see in the chart below:

Now if we start to see higher energy prices and stabilized commodities combined with rising consumer confidence (like what we saw in August and September), then that should help start a reversal in this negative earnings trend. Even a December Fed rate hike could really boost three sectors in particular. You can find out which three by clicking here.

Personally, I believe a recession hitting in 2017 is entirely possible. I’m just not ready to throw my hat in the ring with the rest of the pack.

At least, not right now…

Have a fantastic weekend!

Tom Gentile

2 Responses to “The Shocking Reason Economists’ “Recession Cries” May Be Right This Time”

Leave a Comment

View this page online: